Thursday, March 27, 2008

Overweight and Dementia

I must admit to watching "The Biggest Loser" on Tuesday nights. Its one of the few shows I watch but there are a lot of things about it that bug me ( the constant crying!, the endless commercials, the replaying of what they just showed you before the commercial - just make it ONE hour, instead of TWO!...) I don't really even care who wins but the physical transformations are quite riveting- its motivating to see those changes every week...

Besides the physical improvements and what I hope would be a better mental outlook by not being depressed about not fitting into clothes as I'd like to... there was even more health news announced yesterday that ups the ante... Big bellies lead to a higher incidence of dementia years later.
Must go on a diet... lose 20 lbs!! Given what I learned in one of my previous jobs, which entailed reviewing 1000's of medical records of people that have died, I think that besides cancer, the two worst health problems to have are diabetes and Alzheimers. Suffer now or suffer worse later! Yikes. Just do it!

Update on "Jane Doe" inquiry IDOC

Update on Previous Posts:

I received this email reply today from Roger Walker, the Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections:

" Dear Ms. Z___:

Thank you very much for your correspondence regarding the newspaper articles you reference in your note. Please know that I share your concerns regarding the safety of inmates in our custody. I would like to make one thing very clear, I do not and will not condone the type of behavior that is claimed in the Tribune story. During my tenure as director we have been aggressive in following up on allegations of sexual misconduct, we have also been aggressive in prosecuting these cases as well. I wanted to respond to your note to let you know I will not tolerate this type of behavior.

Sincerely,
Roger E. Walker Jr.
Director
Illinois Department of Corrections
1301 Concordia Court
Springfield, IL 62794 "

Here is my email to him, sent March 18th:

Dear Mr. Walker :

I have contacted Gov. Blagojevich and my local state Rep. Sandra Pihos (House district #42) and Senator Durbin to express my deep dismay at the atrocities alleged to be committed by male guards against female inmates at Dwight. I hope that you will do everything possible to ensure that this never happens again. I hope that you will act immediately to institute policies to safeguard women who make future allegations, instead of putting them in seclusion/segregation where they are even more vulnerable to abuse! Those guards need to be punished to the fullest extent of the law. WHy do you want criminals working for you? This is a travesty and a shame upon our state. Please abide by the 8th Amendment of the Constitution, respect the taxpayers of Illinois and ensure that justice is carried out in a fair and humane manner.

Sincerely, L____ Z_____

forwarded
From: lz___

To: community@sandrapihos.comSubject: questionDate: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:22:25 -0600

Hi Sandy: I just sent this letter to the Governor, and a different email to Senator Durbin about an article I read in the Tribune on Tuesday:
" As chief executive law officer in our state I would like to bring this to your attention:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-prison-rape-04mar04,0,739400.story
Do you know this warden Mary Sigler, or Roger Walker the person who runs IDOC. Do you have confidence in their leadership? It appears that this tragic woman and perhaps many others are being illegally submitted to "cruel and unusual" punishment -- by that I mean, repeatedly gang-raped and impregnated (!) by state officers. Can you do anything about this?? This is beyond horrendous.... Please look into this and make sure that prisoners are not being tortured under the incarceration of the State of Illinois. This level of abuse IS torture, plain and simple. I beg you to clean up IDOC. I don't even know anyone in prison but there must be some basic level of sympathy and compassion for women who have had to endure this.
Sincerely,
L___Z____

Is there a committee in the IL House that has oversight on these kinds of issues? Can you please ask them to investigate this. It defies explanation. This topic is yucky to say the least, but I think as officials in our state you and your colleagues have a responsibility to ensure the safety of the citizen's in the State, ESPECIALLY if they are under the "lock & key" of the State! All of these guards need to be punished to the fullest extent of the law, not just the one whose DNA matches the baby. The management of these facilities needs to ensure that there is NO ABUSE. ( Follow the law, the EIGHTH Amendment!). If the wardens and IDOC managers can't do that, then they need to be removed from those positions of authority.

Thanks,

L____

Friday, March 21, 2008

Iraq War - 5 years on

A brilliant retrospective by Andrew Sullivan on the 5 year anniversary of the war. Yesterday I forced myself to watch this movie online "Leading to War" so I could remember and understand why I was not really against it when it started. ( If you too are feeling guilty about being optimistic about the war this will make you feel somewhat better... it was a deliberate PR campaign of lies. But even now I still feel that I should have been more skeptical at the time!

" I certainly never believed that a conservative would embrace torture as the central thrust of an anti-terror strategy, and lie about it, and scapegoat underlings for it, and give us the indelible stain of Bagram and Camp Cropper and Abu Ghraib and all the other secret torture and interrogation sites that he created and oversaw. I certainly never believed that a war I supported for the sake of freedom would actually use as its central weapon the deepest antithesis of freedom - the destruction of human autonomy and dignity and will that is torture. To distort this by shredding the English language, by engaging in newspeak that I had long associated with totalitarian regimes, was a further insult. And for me, an epiphany about what American conservatism had come to mean.

I know our enemy is much worse. I have never doubted that. But I never believed that America would do what America has done. Never. My misjudgment at the deepest moral level of what Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld were capable of - a misjudgment that violated the moral core of the enterprise - was my worst mistake. What the war has done to what is left of Iraq - the lives lost, the families destroyed, the bodies tortured, the civilization trashed - was bad enough. But what was done to America - and the meaning of America - was unforgivable. And for that I will not and should not forgive myself either."

Meanwhile, our VP says, ... "So..?" when asked how he feels when told that now over 65% of Americans are against the war.

When asked how that assessment comports with recent polls that show about two-thirds of Americans say the fight in Iraq is not worth it, Cheney replied, "So?"
"You don't care what the American people think?" Raddatz asked the vice president.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Organ donation- selling kidneys

This is an interesting post and 10 min. video on Organ donation and presenting the option of selling kidneys, which is currently illegal. I don't know if this is the right solution, but I know that the waiting list is NOT going down, its going up - over 70,000 people... these people are suffering and dying way too early. Not fair.


Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Abu Ghraib photo background



Its been awhile since I've thought about "the photo", why it was so iconic since many of the abuses were even so much worse than that... this excerpt strikes me as very relevant during Holy Week


Harman was right: there were worse pictures than Gilligan. But, leaving aside that photographs of death and nudity, however newsworthy, don’t get much play in the press, the power of an image does not necessarily lie in what it depicts. A photograph of a mangled cadaver, or of a naked man trussed in torment, can shock and outrage, provoke protest and investigation, but it leaves little to the imagination. It may be rich in practical information, while being devoid of any broader meaning. To the extent that it represents any circumstances or conditions beyond itself, it does so generically. Such photographs are repellent, in large part because they have a terrible, reductive sameness. Except from a forensic point of view, they are unambiguous, and have the quality of pornography. They are what they show, nothing more. They communicate no vision and, shorn of context, they offer little, if anything, to think about, no occasion for wonder. They have no value as symbols.


Of course, the dominant symbol of Western civilization is the figure of a nearly naked man, tortured to death—or, more simply, the torture implement itself, the cross. But our pictures of the savage death of Jesus are the product of religious imagination and idealization. In reality, he must have been ghastly to behold. Had there been cameras at Calvary, would twenty centuries of believers have been moved to hang photographs of the scene on their altarpieces and in their homes?



The image of Gilligan achieves its power from the fact that it does not show the human form laid bare and reduced to raw matter but creates instead an original image of inhumanity that admits no immediately self-evident reading. Its fascination resides, in large part, in its mystery and inscrutability—in all that is concealed by all that it reveals. It is an image of carnival weirdness: this upright body shrouded from head to foot; those wires; that pose; and the peaked hood that carries so many vague and ghoulish associations. The pose is obviously contrived and theatrical, a deliberate invention that appears to belong to some dark ritual, a primal scene of martyrdom. The picture transfixes us because it looks like the truth, but, looking at it, we can only imagine what that truth is: torture, execution, a scene staged for the camera? So we seize on the figure of Gilligan as a symbol that stands for all that we know was wrong at Abu Ghraib and all that we cannot—or do not want to—understand about how it came to this"


Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Easter Blues

Ditto - I've been feeling this way lately to0

"Skepticism is a stimulant, not to be repressed. It is an antidote to smugness and the great glow of satisfaction one gains from being right. You know the self-righteous -- I've been one myself -- the little extra topspin they put on the truth, their ostentatious modesty, the pleasure they take in being beautifully modulated and cool and correct when others are falling apart. Jesus was rougher on those people than He was on the adulterers and prostitutes.

So I will sit in the doubter's chair for a while and see what is to be learned back there. "


Unlike Garrison Keillor, I'm not a bass though...alto. Sometimes its the music that keeps me connected when nothing else is getting through the "skepticism/the world-is-going-to-hell-in -a-handbasket" filter...

Even though its STILL grey and cold, I was really cheered up by The Speech today though. Hopefully my prayers will be answered in November....

No Torture. NoExceptions

Wow - this should about cover every possible reason to end torture - NO TORTURE. NO EXCEPTIONS from the Washington Monthly- I'm going to read as much as I can. Maybe I will buy a copy and send it to Rep Roskam.
(h/t Matt Yglesias at The Atlantic)

Corporate Welfare

This is a good post on HuffPo about the Bear Sterns bailout:

" So, what are the answers? First, if the government is going to bail you out, then the government should be regulating you to make sure you're not going to need a bailout. I'm not a fan of over-regulation (but we're nowhere near that), but no regulation at all is just as dumb, if not dumber.

Second, shut the fuck up about bootstraps. If you're going to keep bailing out the largest companies in the world, you better be prepared to do the same for the average American when they run in to some trouble. Laissez-faire my ass. This is rank hypocrisy.

Third, you need balance, whether it's a hand up for the common guy or a regulation for big business. Too much of anything provides the wrong incentives, but too little leaves people hanging in the wind. We need some welfare and some regulation. Not too much, not too little.

Finally, when someone tells you about their ideology of free markets unfettered by any government intervention, they better not come crying home to mama when they need help from that same government they've been bashing for the last sixty years."

Obama's speech


I must admit I left my office upstairs to go downstairs to watch THE SPEECH on race by Barack Obama. As usual, Andrew Sullivan says everything I feel (and more!) with much more eloquence then I'll ever be able to muster in a 1000 years. Please watch the whole speech. I am absolutely convinced Senator Obama is going to be our next President. He is the Right man at the Right time. No politician has EVER been this candid! It was emotional for me and I can only imagine what significance it has for the African-American audience.

Sullivan: " But I do want to say that this searing, nuanced, gut-wrenching, loyal, and deeply, deeply Christian speech is the most honest speech on race in America in my adult lifetime. It is a speech we have all been waiting for for a generation. Its ability to embrace both the legitimate fears and resentments of whites and the understandable anger and dashed hopes of many blacks was, in my view, unique in recent American history.

And it was a reflection of faith - deep, hopeful, transcending faith in the promises of the Gospels. And it was about America - its unique promise, its historic purpose, and our duty to take up the burden to perfect this union - today, in our time, in our way."

Friday, March 14, 2008

Telecom immunity- voted down in House

Yeah!! Surprise - the US House passed a bill that does NOT include telecom immunity. Woo hoo!
All the details here,and here and here. Finally they stopped caving! Today I have finally started to almost admire Speaker Pelosi. They did the right thing, thank God.

Abortion & Torture

I think this is an interesting post (h/t Andrew Sullivan) . Read all the comments too -some smart people over there... will have to go back and visit this site, very philosophical... I've thought a lot about this recently, wondering to myself "why" am I so obsessed with this torture issue? I had a feeling like "I bet this is how pro-life protesters feel about their cause... like, WHY aren't more people UPSET about this??!! "

" Yet--have I missed something? I did, after all, attempt to separate the "monstrousness" of an act from its ultimate evil. I believe, after all, that wrong-doing requires intention. Killing someone accidentally is a fault, but not the same wrong as killing someone intentionally. Is it different, then, for a woman who does not believe she is killing a human being to abort a nascent child than for a soldier to torture someone? I think it is. Dramatically so. Many women believe they are acting out of compassion (however mistakenly); is it possible for a torturer to hold similar beliefs? To put it poetically: how blackened are the souls of all involved in torture? How blackened are the souls of all involved in abortion?

I think torture is the most manifestly destructive to all human goodness, because it is less possible to commit the crime through simple error. It requires significant subversion of a person's humanity to make him into a torturer (even if it is frighteningly easy to do), whereas it requires significant attention to specific arguments to convince someone of the evil of abortion. As such, I think we need to pay greater attention to obliterating all instances of torture than to obliterating instances of abortion."

RTWT! This also reminds me about a book I finished a couple of weeks ago..."Fear Up Harsh: An Army Interrogator's Dark Journey Through Iraq". The author Tony Lagouranis details the devolution of torture and how easily it spreads... how it doesn't WORK to get good information and mainly how it had such a horrible effect on his psyche knowing that he was capable of evil in these circumstances. The soldiers have to deal with this there and when they come back.... Good summary story from the Chicago Reader





Thursday, March 13, 2008

Precinct Committeeman


So I found out today that even though I didn't get all my write-in votes during the Primary on 2/5, that the Milton Township Democrats have officially appointed me to be the Precinct Committeeman for my precinct!

Yeah ! - I guess that at the next meeting there will be plans announced for our strategy to gain more Dem votes in the fall election. I'm excited to get started! I need to get an email contact list together. I already know at least 2 neighbors in my precinct who want to help out too.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Dwight Correctional Center - sexual abuse by guards

Update on previous posts

"For the second time in two weeks, a female former Dwight Correctional Center inmate has filed a lawsuit alleging prison officials failed to investigate sexual misconduct by male guards.

Shawntay Wright, 30, contends she was punished with six months in what she describes as solitary confinement after she reported a guard's sexual advances toward her in April 2006.

Prison officials apologized months later, after the same guard allegedly assaulted two other female inmates and was fired, according to a lawsuit filed Monday in federal court in Chicago"

I hope there is justice with these cases soon!

Follow the Money


Gee I wonder where all the Iraqi oil money is going? Rebuilding the country or swiss bank accounts for when the !*&$ hits the fan and we pull out?

Bush doesn't even know how much a gallon of gas is going to cost this summer, $4 !

3 trillion and counting RTWT.

Libby MT


I was glad to hear about this on the radio this morning:


" W. R. Grace & Company, a worldwide chemical company driven into bankruptcy by hundreds of millions of dollars in asbestos poisoning claims, has agreed to pay the federal government $250 million for environmental cleanup around its mining operations in Libby, Mont. ....
The settlement announced on Tuesday takes account of that payment and directs that future payments be directed to a special E.P.A. account to be used to clean schools, homes and businesses in Libby that are contaminated with carcinogenic asbestos dust.

The material came from a vermiculite mine and processing plant the company operated in and near Libby from 1963 to 1990. The vermiculite, which is used in insulation and other building materials, was contaminated with high levels of asbestos.

Asbestos is known to cause lung cancer and mesothelioma, a fatal tumor of the lining of the chest and abdomen. Exposure to asbestos also causes scarring of lung tissue."

There is still a criminal case pending... I saw a documentary about this case awhile ago. Its probably on Netflix now. As much as I am for environmentalism and health, I also have a fondness for small-town Montana and Montanans because my sister was born there and we lived there a little while when I was a young child.

Monday, March 10, 2008

Verizon and I will no longer be doing business together

Now I feel morally compelled to drop Verizon. (Scott Horton, Harpers)

" And all of this occurs as another engineer has come forward to blow the whistle on the lawless surveillance of telecommunications by the Bush National Surveillance State.

Babak Pasdar, a computer security consultant, has gone public about his discovery of a mysterious “Quantico Circuit” while working for an unnamed major wireless carrier. Pasdar believes that this circuit gives the U.S. government direct, unfettered access to customers voice calls and data packets. These claims echo the disclosures from retired AT&T technician Mark Klein, who has described a “secret room” in an AT&T facility.


The name of the wireless carrier that collaborated in the installation of the “Quantico Circuit,” allowing the Bush Administration to spy on every phone conversation, text message and other communications it transmits, with no warrants or prior approval?
Verizon.

Michael McConnell will of course insist that the intelligence community is looking only at foreign communications involving suspect terrorists. And that statement is a lie. In fact the technology employed allows the indiscriminate filtering of all communications of all types. And as to what portion is actually examined with any particularity, on that particular point, we’re told “trust us.” But why? I suggest we repose our trust elsewhere, namely: in the Constitution.


Surveillance is not outlawed. But it is bound to a system of constraints and checks. The Administration must justify its targets and must be subject to the oversight of a magistrate. That is what the Founding Fathers provided. And there is no reason to move from this system; what has transpired over the last six years provides only more evidence of its wisdom.


Damn! I just had a conversation about this a week ago with my Verizon rep on the phone when I was trying to get a text/data plan added to J's phone on our family plan. He didn't know anything about it so I filled him in. Since I knew Qwest was the only telecom who put up a stink I figured Verizon was one of them, however I didn't know for sure so I kept my head in the sand as long as I could. This is going to be a really tangled web to unweave but I have to do it. Their loss of a great customer for 7+ years, monthly bills always >$120 (mostly expensible business calls & data plan for my Treo. Too bad, so sad. Follow the law corporate overlords! So much for the free market... I'm taking my business elsewhere. Why worry about bad press from lawsuits when your business practices will drive your customers away first.

"We live in the age of the Great Betrayal, in an age in which too few are willing to state the obvious. There is still time to check the progress of tyrannical power, but the hour grows late, and the sounds of alarm no longer seem to register with a somnolent populace."

NSA Domestic Spying



So its all here in the left-wing ;~) Wall Street Journal...

" Two former officials familiar with the data-sifting efforts said they work by starting withsome sort of lead, like a phone number or Internet address. In partnership with the FBI,the systems then can track all domestic and foreign transactions of people associated withthat item -- and then the people who associated with them, and so on, casting a gradually wider net. An intelligence official described more of a rapid-response effect: If a person suspected of terrorist connections is believed to be in a U.S. city -- for instance, Detroit, a community with a high concentration of Muslim Americans -- the government's spy systems may be directed to collect and analyze all electronic communications into and out of the city.

The haul can include records of phone calls, email headers and destinations, data on financial transactions and records of Internet browsing. The system also would collect information about other people, including those in the U.S., who communicated with people in Detroit.

The information doesn't generally include the contents of conversations or emails. But it can give such transactional information as a cellphone's location, whom a person is calling, and what Web sites he or she is visiting. For an email, the data haul can include the identities of the sender and recipient and the subject line, but not the content of the message.


Intelligence agencies have used administrative subpoenas issued by the FBI -- which don't need a judge's signature -- to collect and analyze such data, current and former intelligence officials said. If that data provided "reasonable suspicion" that a person, whether foreign or from the U.S., was linked to al Qaeda, intelligence officers could eavesdrop under the NSA's Terrorist Surveillance Program."

So what is "REASONABLE SUSPICION"? Having an Arabic sounding last name? What I'm even more worried about is oh I don't know, law enforcement officers/politicians having a reasonable suspicion to link each other with a foreign government or hmmm maybe even a prostitute that can allieve a certain NY governor's stress illegally. Besides wanting to fight terrorism, its also all about who is open to bribery and ruining careers etc.

The Republicans aren't going to be concerned about privacy until a Democrat is in the White House... then maybe they'll start worrying about who is spying on whom. Don't get me wrong, I certainly don't think the Dems should have this surveillance power either. This could get very nasty and we wouldn't even know about it... politicians would 'retire' or be humiliated in public... an effective coup d' etat. How could whistleblowers get information to government officials that could publicize it if they know their phone and emails are going to be spied on? Deep freeze on democracy if you ask me.... not to mention the 4th amendment.

This makes me so angry!

Client 9

All over the blogosphere today about Elliot Spitzer the Governor of NY.... Absolutely fascinating, sad, but can't look away. It seems so unfathomable to me that somebody with so much to lose would do something so stupid. Someone who is in law enforcement and politics brought down for breaking the law. So surprising ...who's next, squeeky clean Patrick Fitzgerald? ( please no, we have to have some hope left for the uber-justice fighters! seriously!) I feel so sorry for his teenage daughters and his wife, but especially his daughters.

Press, Centrism

Glenn Greenwald argues that


"In reality, it is the preachers of Centrism and Balance who stand exposed as the deeply irresponsible and mindless enablers of the last eight years. We needed far more unvarnished opposition to the administration and the political establishment that supported it, and far less of the Balanced Bush apologists and Centrist Mavens embodied by the likes of David Broder, Fred Hiatt and Joe Klein.

"Balance" and "centrism" are only virtues when prevailing circumstances are actually balanced and centered. When they're not -- as they haven't been for the last eight years at least -- respectful balance and restrained centrism are delusions, self-regarding luxuries, ones that can be as dangerous and destructive as they are slothful and unserious."


So what this says to me is that maybe my activism maybe should not be so "reluctant"....centered and "fair". Touche, Glenn- I hear you.


Friday, March 7, 2008

Update on Jane Doe

Update on yesterday's post
In addition to the letter to the Trib, I sent emails asking my elected officials ( Blago, Pihos, Durbin) and the Midwest Chapter of Amnesty International asking them all to look into this crime. I also sent a letter of support to her lawyer.

I received a reply from Sandy Pihos- my state rep. She said she shares my concern, did not have any other info on the situation yet, but when back in Springfield " will question where they are in the process". Her lawyer said she's hoping to make this into a class action - -which just means there are going to be more horrible stories to come - but hopefully a higher awareness will help solve the problem sooner.

Another update: from Flying Hamsters of Doom ( Note to self -remember to include contact details like this so other people reading it can take action- duh!) I liked reading this blog.

Thursday, March 6, 2008

Letter to Senator Durbin -Rule of Law?

Dear Senator Durbin:

In light of our recent correspondence regarding the Mukasey nomination and his subsequent legal support of President Bush's unconsitutional policies....Here's an interesting editorial I whole-heartedly agree with:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-turley4mar04,0,4839406.story

I don't know what you can do, but you must do something. We need to have rule of law, not a king who can have his minions tell us what the law is or is not.

"Check and Balance" the Executive branch!!! Tell your Democratic colleagues not to capitulate. Somebody needs to call them out and call "a spade a spade". Ask him to explain this paradox. Is there ANY situation in which he would find any hypothetical crime the President committed worthy of the Justice Dept's investigation --if the President's lawyers told him it was legal?

Speaking of rule of law back in Illinois... did you see this in the Trib? http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-prison-rape-04mar04,0,739400.story
Do you know this warden Mary Sigler, or Roger Walker the person who runs IDOC. It appears that this tragic woman and perhaps many others are being illegally submitted to "cruel and unusual" punishment -- by that I mean, repeatedly gang-raped and impregnated (!) by state officers. Can you do anything about this??

Sincerely,
L

"Ignorance is Strength" (Orwell, 1984)



This is the cognitive dissonance we need to recognize and pay attention to:


" In his twisting of legal principles, the attorney general has succeeded in creating a perfect paradox. Under Mukasey's Paradox, lawyers cannot commit crimes when they act under the orders of a president -- and a president cannot commit a crime when he acts under advice of lawyers....


When reduced to its purest form, Mukasey's Paradox is that government officials cannot violate the law -- but that because executive privilege is also a law, it's sometimes necessary to violate the law in order to uphold the law."


RTWT! (LA Times Editorial by Jonathan Turley)
He's right, its completely twisted. Wake up Winstons!

DuPage Democrats




They did it!


" Operation: Turn DuPage Blue can no longer be considered an offshoot of the county's Democratic Party.

They're running things now.

The splinter group's chairman, Bob Peickert, handily defeated incumbent DuPage County Democratic Party Chairman Rob Bisceglie at Wednesday night's convention in Wheaton.
In all, 215 of the nearly 250 Democratic precinct committeemen showed up to vote for new party leadership.

"I think what this signifies is the Democratic Party is more united than ever before," Peickert said shortly after the results were announced. "This is a party to be reckoned with. This is the biggest turnout of elected Democrat leaders in DuPage ever."

Peickert's group was formed a little more than a year ago in an effort to grow the Democratic Party in DuPage County. Among the successes Operation: Turn DuPage Blue helped garner is the doubling of elected precinct committeemen and more voters picking Democratic ballots over Republican ballots in the Feb. 5 primary. That was widely regarded as a first in anyone's memory." (Jake Griffin- Daily Herald)

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Monday, March 3, 2008

FISA perspectives: Now vs. Then (1977)



"Back then -- with a relentless, ideologically extreme Evil Empire threatening our very existence and our freedoms -- GOP fear-mongering was brushed aside. The political establishment overwhelmingly concluded that warrantless eavesdropping presented intolerable dangers, and many believed that FISA's "safeguards" were actually woefully inadequate. Telecoms lobbied on behalf of their customers' privacy rights and against being drawn into government surveillance. Editorial boards were almost unanimously on the side of greater oversight on presidential spying.


That all seems so quaint. The mindset which back then defined the radical, pro-surveillance right-wing fringe has now become the sweet spot of our political establishment. The GOP fear-mongering that back then was laughed away today dominates our discourse and shapes our laws. The secret FISA court which back then was viewed even by some conservatives as an extreme threat to civil liberties is now the outermost liberal viewpoint, one that is about to be ejected altogether by the Democratic Congress from the mainstream spectrum. The political establishment today knows only one viewpoint: literally no limits are tolerable on the power of the loving, protective Surveillance State."

Obama on NCLB, Teaching, & Parenting

Can't resist:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0L2GEBhd2w

I just sent this to my neighbor L the teacher. Sometimes I think about how exhausting and grueling it must be to campaign non-stop for a year and a half, but when you see this he almost makes it look like fun! He's going to be a GREAT PRESIDENT!!!
(h/t Andrew Sullivan)